How teacher upgrade programs can improve student achievement

0
9
How teacher upgrade programs can improve student achievement

It seems like a great idea: pay teachers more if their students learn more. But does it work?

Regardless of the increasing popularity of teacher promotion programs, no one does not know whether to make a positive impact on the student’s achievement, or if they are worth the extra cost of the precious government education fund.

New York (Reuters Health) – The teacher promotion program, if designed properly, according to a new study by an economist at the University of California, Riverside, in some materials, students can improve the achievement and can be cost effective .

Studies of current and experimental teacher promotion programs have shown mixed results, which in some cases are leading to higher student scores, but not in other. Researchers believe that the contradiction is about how programs are designed.

Programs sponsoring teachers as a group encourage free ride and students do not improve the achievement.

Individuals with individually educator compensation programs have little effect on student achievement.

Associate Professor of economics at California Riverside University, Ozkan Arren examined the Mixed Teacher Incentive program, which is called the Teacher Improvement Program or the TAP Program in Personal and Group Incentives.

One of the nation’s largest education programs, TAP often combines advocacy and continuous professional development in increasing urban schools with educational responsiveness and performance-based compensation.

The groups of less experienced teachers meet daily with high skilled teachers to learn new teaching strategies and get personal training. Teachers are evaluated several times during the school year in nearly 20 different areas of effective teaching practices.

Finally, teachers are eligible for additional compensation based on the performance of their students as well as their students’ performance. Teachers receive awards different from the teaching practices and learning outcomes.

Erin examined the data obtained from Louisiana for 40 schools applying the TAP program from 2005 to 2011.

In the first year, he did not find any improvement in the mathematics exam score, but the improvement for the third year was stable and exciting.

Social studies have been equally observed, although the test scores are statistically improved while there is no improvement in English or science.

Evidence was found that other factors, such as changes in faculty structure, were not responsible for improvement.

A survey of teachers revealed that many of them had changed their teaching practices as a result of the program, which contributed to its success.

The benefits of the program exceeded the cost. The average cost of TAP in Louisiana is $ 350 to $ 400 per student.

Array used a standard formula to assess the future earnings based on this assumption that only one-fourth of the test benefits of the exam reflect real learning and found that the TAP program for mathematics is almost in the school year Can increase the potential profit of $ 945,000. It was cost effective even when the mathematical scores improved.

The study concluded that both hybrid structures involved in both individual and group promotions could have good results.

Multiple and understandable performance metrics, as well as regular feedback for teachers, can make incentive programs more effective.

Finally, award teachers should be strong enough to motivate them to adjust their teaching practices.

“Teacher Incentives and Student Achievements: A Guide to Advanced Program”, published in the Journal of Policy Analysis and Management.

Associate Professor of economics at California Riverside University, Ozkan Arren examined the Mixed Teacher Incentive program, which is called the Teacher Improvement Program or the TAP Program in Personal and Group Incentives.

One of the nation’s largest education programs, TAP often combines advocacy and continuous professional development in increasing urban schools with educational responsiveness and performance-based compensation.

The groups of less experienced teachers meet daily with high skilled teachers to learn new teaching strategies and get personal training.

Teachers are evaluated several times during the school year in nearly 20 different areas of effective teaching practices.

Finally, teachers are eligible for additional compensation based on the performance of their students as well as their students’ performance. Teachers receive awards different from the teaching practices and learning outcomes.

 

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here